I Was in Love with My Dyson CameraJet. Then It Stopped Working.

29.09.2026, 22:32 allure.com

Temperatures are dropping, leaves are turning, and the romance I jumped into just before Labor Day weekend is already over. I thought this fast, bright-burning new love was going to set the tone for my fall, my winter—early mornings together, late nights, intimate one-on-one time at home and, if I was lucky, maybe it would last forever.

There were some red flags early on, but of course, I ignored them, too enraptured by the idea of what could be to realize what was. Our trust dissipated almost all at once: My partner’s diaphragm pump started to slow. The conical jet began misfiring. In hindsight, maybe it wasn’t vibrating at 245 times per second anymore. Then, it simply wouldn’t turn on, effectively ghosting me.

I’m not talking about a human, or a sex toy (I’m not Charlotte York in that one episode of Sex and the City) or an object repurposed as one (I’m not Samantha Jones, either). I’m talking about the Dyson CameraJet.

What I thought was the Rolls-Royce of toothbrushes arrived at the beginning of the month to much fanfare—a launch event in Paris heralded the arrival of the world’s first toothbrush-water-flosser hybrid that relied on a camera the size of a pencil tip to fire mouthwash in between teeth while you brush, effectively folding three dental hygiene steps into one. Last spring, Allure’s executive beauty director Jenny Bailly had traveled to Dyson’s UK labs to get a top-secret sneak peek of the new innovation. She wasn’t allowed to test it, but was certainly impressed with the rigor that had gone into bringing the concept to life: “The idea first arose nine years ago, and they spent six years working on the CameraJet—that’s one more than the bagless vacuum cleaner that debuted in 1983 or the hair-dryer that blew us away in 2016.”

The CameraJet sticker shock was gobsmacking. $499 for a toothbrush is a tall order, but one I didn’t find unreasonable once I used the device. On the day of the launch, I was sent a toothbrush gratis from Dyson to test, and after a couple of blissful ays with it determined I would gladly fork over the full price if the device were ever to need replacement, many years in the future of course. (And I went on camera to say so.) I mean, remember when Dyson launched the Supersonic hair dryer a decade ago? The $400 price tag for a hair dryer was obscene at first, but the tool’s performance changed our minds (plus, it just looked so cool). The CameraJet is sleek, elegant, and the cobalt blue oral-hygiene monolith looked great on my bathroom counter. Its charging and refill dock barely squeezed under my medicine cabinet, but that was something I easily overlooked… until it died.

My experience isn’t happening in a vacuum. I’ve seen complaints across social media from people who shelled out $500 for Dyson’s latest innovation, only to find themselves with a lemon. One editor at Consumer Reports said the toothbrush Dyson sent her to test died “less than 24 hours” after she opened the box (and before she ever had a chance to try it). I might actually be one of the lucky ones who had a working device for almost three weeks. (My colleague has also been testing a CameraJet and hers is still turning on, but the automatic firing of the jet has slowed dramatically.) As of today, the CameraJet is out of stock on both dyson.com and sephora.com.

Allure reached out to Dyson for comment on the current availability of the toothbrush, why it’s been failing for so many consumers, and whether a formal recall would be issued. A spokesperson responded that “unfortunately, one production batch of jet tubes experienced a process issue, creating a potential for water seepage which affected the performance of a small number of products. We took what we believe to be the right decision to isolate impacted products, which resulted in an out-of-stock position. We are now in full production and shipping product to our partners. We are sorry that we have let down our loyal customers and we will do all we can to support them.” Dyson did not provide a date when the CameraJet would be available for purchase again, or respond to our question about the return policy on the toothbrush.

In theory, the CameraJet is an incredibly sophisticated piece of machinery. It runs on 16 million lines of code, and the AI learning system it relies on to detect tooth gaps was trained on 470,000 dental images. It even connects to the Dyson app, where you can get a livestream of the inside of your mouth while you brush. That raised understandable privacy concerns among some (though Dyson said the videos are not stored in its app or the cloud). Personally, I felt the only thing Dyson could glean about me from between my molars was how diligently I floss. No concerns there. A toothbrush that may be failing upon contact with water, however is highly concerning to me. And certainly not an issue I’ve encountered before. It reminds me of when Apple first introduced Siri, and my new iPhone model at the time couldn’t connect to cellular data. To paraphrase my conversation with a Genius Bar employee: “Siri’s great and I love the new camera features, but I’d like a cell phone I can call and text from.”

Dyson has a great track record, at least in my house, where I’ve used the same Supersonic hair dryer for nearly a decade and the same cordless vacuum for the last five years. But the CameraJet is going to have to produce a lot more receipts before I even consider getting back together. A press release from the device’s launch says it removes plaque up to 69 percent more than “marked-leading premium electric toothbrushes in hard-to-reach areas.” However, Allure has been asking for clinical data on the CameraJet since we knew it only as a prototype called “682,” and so far the only study shared with us compared the CameraJet to a manual toothbrush.

So while I wait for more evidence—and keep an eye on when this item will even be available again—I’m going back to my less-sexy-yet-more-reliable ex, a Philips Sonicare model I got a few years ago. I know my tryst with my CameraJet burned bright, but it went as fast as it came. God, what a tool.

Read more about current beauty news:

• Raven-Symoné on Body Image, Breast Reductions, and Ditching “Performative Hyperfemininity”• Zara Larsson's Pop Girl Dreams• Gen Z Loves an Aesthetic, But Madonna Never Had Just One.